Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13
+99.6%

Xeon E-2314 outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17441212
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.207.46
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes844
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
Xeon E-2314 5.13
+99.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4076
Xeon E-2314 8146
+99.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 5.13
Recency 11 January 2021 8 September 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N5095 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has a 99.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The Xeon E-2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1463 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.