Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Celeron N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.67
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.42
+590%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 590% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1722341
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency16.2347.99
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1338FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCI Express lanes8no data
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.67
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.42
+590%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4083
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28187
+590%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5095 364
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+548%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5095 106
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+159%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5095 2028
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959
+391%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5095 1547
+623%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 214

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5095 651
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956
+201%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5095 3100
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 6215
+100%

7-Zip

Celeron N5095 11013
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 61303
+457%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5095 125
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296
+136%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 18.42
Integrated graphics card 5.57 18.28
Recency 11 January 2021 13 June 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 589.9% higher aggregate performance score, 228.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1431 vote

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.