Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Celeron N5095
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 499% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1740 | 450 |
Place by popularity | 39 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Jasper Lake | no data |
Power efficiency | 16.21 | 52.05 |
Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1338 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | - | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 16 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 20 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Blender(-)
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core
7-Zip Single
7-Zip
WebXPRT 3
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.57 | 15.40 |
Integrated graphics card | 5.58 | 18.34 |
Recency | 11 January 2021 | 6 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron N5095 has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 8840HS, on the other hand, has a 499.2% higher aggregate performance score, 228.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8840HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.