Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Celeron N5095

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.40
+499%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 499% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1740450
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.2152.05
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.40
+499%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4079
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24460
+500%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5095 364
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2045
+462%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5095 106
Ryzen 7 8840HS 268
+153%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5095 2028
Ryzen 7 8840HS 9949
+391%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5095 1547
+567%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 232

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5095 651
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1942
+199%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5095 3100
Ryzen 7 8840HS 6205
+100%

7-Zip

Celeron N5095 11013
Ryzen 7 8840HS 60670
+451%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5095 125
Ryzen 7 8840HS 308
+146%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron N5095 490
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1658
+238%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron N5095 95
Ryzen 7 8840HS 248
+161%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron N5095 2936
+683%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 375

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 15.40
Integrated graphics card 5.58 18.34
Recency 11 January 2021 6 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8840HS, on the other hand, has a 499.2% higher aggregate performance score, 228.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1447 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 184 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.