Atom x3-3205RK vs Celeron N4500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2297not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency19.60no data
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Silvermont (2015)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsMali-450 MP4
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK.

PCI Express lanes8no data
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron N4500 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x3-3205RK, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4500 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500
Intel Atom x3-3205RK
Atom x3-3205RK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 707 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x3-3205RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4500 or Atom x3-3205RK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.