MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Celeron N4100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.55
MediaTek Kompanio 520
8 cores / 8 threads, 2000 Watt
1.99
+28.4%

MediaTek Kompanio 520 outperforms Celeron N4100 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21171921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiency24.450.09
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1090no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4100 1.55
MediaTek Kompanio 520 1.99
+28.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N4100 1271
MediaTek Kompanio 520 1532
+20.5%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N4100 75
MediaTek Kompanio 520 121
+60.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.99
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2000 Watt

Celeron N4100 has 33233.3% lower power consumption.

MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has a 28.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The MediaTek Kompanio 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 431 vote

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4100 or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.