EPYC 9634 vs Celeron N4020

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.97
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.96
+6906%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 6906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking249110
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.11
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.3022.18
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)84
Threads2168
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate15 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1090SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4020 0.97
EPYC 9634 67.96
+6906%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4020 1547
EPYC 9634 107944
+6878%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 67.96
Recency 4 November 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 84
Threads 2 168
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 290 Watt

Celeron N4020 has 4733.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 6906.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 4100% more physical cores and 8300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4020 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1798 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4020 or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.