Atom E3845 vs Celeron N4000C

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.90
+34.3%
Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.67

Celeron N4000C outperforms Atom E3845 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25432739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAtom
Power efficiency13.936.22
Architecture codenameno dataBay Trail-I (2013)
Release date1 April 2019 (5 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.91 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000C 0.90
+34.3%
Atom E3845 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000C 1406
+33.7%
Atom E3845 1052

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 0.67
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 1 April 2019 8 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron N4000C has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Atom E3845, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Celeron N4000C is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 36 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000C or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.