Sempron 3850 vs Celeron N4000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
+29.2%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.72

Celeron N4000 outperforms Sempron 3850 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25132681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency14.672.73
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache112 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 deg C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090AM1
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.4no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.93
+29.2%
Sempron 3850 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000 1472
+28%
Sempron 3850 1150

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N4000 324
+103%
Sempron 3850 160

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N4000 528
Sempron 3850 535
+1.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.72
Recency 11 December 2017 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N4000 has a 29.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Sempron 3850, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 913 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.