Ambiq Apollo 3.5 vs Celeron N3350
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2635 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Cortex-M4F |
| Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $24 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | BGA1296 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 500 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Celeron N3350 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
