A9-9400 SoC vs Celeron N3060
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2973 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 15 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | IDI | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | - | no data |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz) | Radeon R5 3CU |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | no data |
| OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 8 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 January 2016 | 31 May 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron N3060 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N3060 is a notebook processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3060 and A9-9400 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
