Ryzen Threadripper 1998 vs Celeron N3000

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.04 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32768 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt0 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 16

Ryzen Threadripper 1998 has 700% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1998 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998
Ryzen Threadripper 1998

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 26 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1998 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Ryzen Threadripper 1998, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.