Celeron J3355E vs N3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)no data
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed1.04 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard--
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units1212
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX++
OpenGL++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 July 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Celeron J3355E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Celeron J3355E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.