Xeon Silver 4310 vs Celeron N2940

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.66
Xeon Silver 4310
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
13.94
+2012%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Celeron N2940 by a whopping 2012% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2740525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency8.9210.99
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.83 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes464
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2940 0.66
Xeon Silver 4310 13.94
+2012%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2940 1044
Xeon Silver 4310 22146
+2021%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2940 167
Xeon Silver 4310 1237
+641%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2940 501
Xeon Silver 4310 7784
+1454%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 13.94
Recency 22 May 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron N2940 has 1614.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4310, on the other hand, has a 2012.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2940 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2940 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4310 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2940 and Xeon Silver 4310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940
Intel Xeon Silver 4310
Xeon Silver 4310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 106 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 25 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2940 or Xeon Silver 4310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.