Atom x7211E vs Celeron N2930
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2758 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.65 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Gracemont (2023) |
Release date | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | Intel BGA 1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 9 |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 February 2014 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N2930 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom x7211E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2930 and Atom x7211E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.