Processor N200 vs Celeron N2830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
+359%

Processor N200 outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30692122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency4.5924.59
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.16 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes49
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2830 0.34
Processor N200 1.56
+359%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2830 1185
Processor N200 3937
+232%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2830 2240
Processor N200 7549
+237%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2830 1
Processor N200 3
+233%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2830 67
Processor N200 219
+227%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 38
Processor N200 113
+197%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 0.43
Processor N200 1.36
+216%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 1.56
Integrated graphics card 0.77 3.29
Recency 23 February 2014 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 358.8% higher aggregate performance score, 327.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 240 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2830 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.