Celeron M 380 vs N2830

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCeleron M
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Connect+no data
FSB parityno data-
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 21 Watt

Celeron N2830 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Celeron M 380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830
Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 238 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2830 or Celeron M 380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.