EPYC 7443P vs Celeron N2815

Place in the ranking	3105	103
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	24.22
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	3.91	16.97
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	1 December 2013 (11 years ago)	15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$1,337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	2	48
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.13 GHz	4 GHz
Multiplier	no data	28.5
L1 cache	112 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm+
Die size	no data	4x 81 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	16,600 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L-1066	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	N/A
Graphics max frequency	756 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	4	128
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2815 0.31

EPYC 7443P 35.86
+11468%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2815 492

EPYC 7443P 56966
+11478%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2815 151

EPYC 7443P 1686
+1017%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2815 251

EPYC 7443P 14496
+5675%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	35.86
Recency	1 December 2013	15 March 2021
Physical cores	2	24
Threads	2	48
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	200 Watt

Celeron N2815 has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443P, on the other hand, has a 11467.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2815 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2815 and EPYC 7443P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.