Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N2815
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Celeron N2815 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3106 | 2818 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.91 | 0.45 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) | August 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1066 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 756 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.31 | 0.59 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron N2815 has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1685.7% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 90.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron N2815 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2815 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
