Ultra 7 265K vs Celeron N2810

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3176	88
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	94.18
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	3.23	27.96
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date	11 September 2013 (11 years ago)	24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$260	$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads	2	20
Base clock speed	2 GHz	3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	5.5 GHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	112 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	3 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Die size	no data	243 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	17,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	1851
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
SIPP	-	+
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Graphics max frequency	756 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	4	20
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.24	37.13
Recency	11 September 2013	24 October 2024
Physical cores	2	20
Threads	2	20
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---