Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Celeron N2808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data62.36
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Strix Point (2024)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP8
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon 880M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2808 510
Ryzen AI 9 365 29314
+5648%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 35 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.