Atom D525 vs Celeron N2808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.58 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GB4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel GMA 3150
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Atom D525.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2808 510
+26.9%
Atom D525 402

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 21 June 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 13 Watt

Celeron N2808 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 214 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.