Atom D2500 vs Celeron N2807

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2807
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.31
+107%
Atom D2500
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.15

Celeron N2807 outperforms Atom D2500 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31083314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency7.331.42
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.58 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
Smart Connect+no data
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GB4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel GMA
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports22
Number of USB ports58

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2807 0.31
+107%
Atom D2500 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2807 486
+102%
Atom D2500 241

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.15
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.01
Recency 23 February 2014 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron N2807 has a 106.7% higher aggregate performance score, 7600% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2807 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 36 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2807 or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.