Ryzen 7 7745HX vs Celeron N2806
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 243 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Dragon Range (Zen 4) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 7745HX outperforms Celeron N2806 by 6602% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Ryzen 7 7745HX outperforms Celeron N2806 by 1317% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 7 7745HX outperforms Celeron N2806 by 5378% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen 7 7745HX outperforms Celeron N2806 by 5048% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 7 7745HX outperforms Celeron N2806 by 1033% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2013 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron N2806 has 1275% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7745HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2806 and Ryzen 7 7745HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
