i9-13900K vs Celeron N2806

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated83
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i9
Power efficiencyno data13.92
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache56K (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2806 489
i9-13900K 59096
+11985%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2806 1195
i9-13900K 20192
+1590%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2806 1
i9-13900K 68
+10447%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2806 58
i9-13900K 5806
+9909%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2806 26
i9-13900K 318
+1123%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N2806 has 3025% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2806 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2806 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1875 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2806 or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.