i7-9700F vs Celeron N2805

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.67
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Power efficiencyno data12.14
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.46 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2805 335
i7-9700F 13248
+3855%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N2805 has 1525% lower power consumption.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2805 is a notebook processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 670 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.