Pentium M 705 vs Celeron M P4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+273%
Pentium M 705
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.15

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Pentium M 705 by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28393307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MPentium M
Power efficiency1.510.58
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Banias (2003)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.956V-1.484V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4600 0.56
+273%
Pentium M 705 0.15

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+244%
Pentium M 705 118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 24 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has a 273.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 705, on the other hand, has 45.8% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 705 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
Intel Pentium M 705
Pentium M 705

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium M 705 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Pentium M 705, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.