Xeon Platinum 8380H vs Celeron M 925

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data8
SocketPGA478FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

Celeron M 925 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8380H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 925 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8380H is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Xeon Platinum 8380H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380H
Xeon Platinum 8380H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8380H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 925 or Xeon Platinum 8380H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.