Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Core 2 Duo U7500
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 712 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | no data |
| Release date | 27 July 2006 (18 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.8V-0.975V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PBGA479 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2006 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Core 2 Duo U7500 has 20500% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
