Ultra 7 265T vs Celeron M 585

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die size143 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA4781851
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 585 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, has 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 585 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.