Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Celeron M 575

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data72.52
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date1 June 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size143 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 23 May 2023
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 575 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.