Pentium E2220 vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Pentium E2220 outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3167 | 2869 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.77 |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | no data |
Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
Threads | 1 | no data |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 73 °C |
Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PPGA478 | LGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.25 | 0.53 |
Recency | 1 June 2008 | 1 January 2008 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 109.7% lower power consumption.
Pentium E2220, on the other hand, has a 112% higher aggregate performance score.
The Pentium E2220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 575 is a notebook processor while Pentium E2220 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Pentium E2220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.