Celeron 900 vs M 575

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)no data
Release date1 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHzno data
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 575 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575
Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 53 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 575 or Celeron 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.