Xeon Silver 4410T vs Celeron M 560

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.89
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiencyno data11.47
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$624

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data26.25 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4000
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
Xeon Silver 4410T 28859
+5294%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 10 January 2023
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4410T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4410T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Xeon Silver 4410T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4410T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Xeon Silver 4410T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.