Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)December 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.