Pentium Gold G4620 vs Celeron M 560
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3063 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Pentium, Pentium Gold |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $93 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PPGA478 | LGA-1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 51 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has 70% lower power consumption.
Pentium Gold G4620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while Pentium Gold G4620 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Pentium Gold G4620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
