Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron M 560

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron MPentium 4
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Prescott 2M
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C67 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
+96.7%
Pentium 4 630 272

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 560 2008
+25.1%
Pentium 4 630 1605

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M 560 2008
+1.7%
Pentium 4 630 1975

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 84 Watt

Celeron M 560 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 630, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.