Mobile Sempron SI-42 vs Celeron M 560
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 560 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3078 | 3219 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | 0.79 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Sable (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Mobile Sempron SI-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 1 September 2009 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has a 61.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Mobile Sempron SI-42, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 20% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Mobile Sempron SI-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
