Celeron M 560 vs A10 Micro-6700T

Primary details

Comparing A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2534not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency18.93no data
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 Micro-6700T 1426
+167%
Celeron M 560 535

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 1 May 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 30 Watt

A10 Micro-6700T has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Micro-6700T
A10 Micro-6700T
Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate A10 Micro-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Micro-6700T or Celeron M 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.