Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Celeron M 450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz1066 MHz
L2 cacheno data6 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo SL9300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 450
Celeron M 450
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
Core 2 Duo SL9300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Celeron M 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 450 or Core 2 Duo SL9300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.