Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Celeron M 450
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | Intel Core 2 Duo |
Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $284 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | 1066 MHz |
L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PPGA478 | BGA956 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | - | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | - |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 17 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SL9300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 450 and Core 2 Duo SL9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.