Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Celeron M 440

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 440
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.11
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.97
+16236%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Celeron M 440 by a whopping 16236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3375344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.3960.74
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Strix Point (2024)
Release dateno dataJuly 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FP8
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 440 0.11
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.97
+16236%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 440 169
Ryzen AI 9 365 28545
+16791%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 440 980
Ryzen AI 9 365 14361
+1365%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 17.97
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron M 440 has 3.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 16236.4% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 440 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 440 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 440
Celeron M 440
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 42 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 440 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.