Ryzen 5 7520C vs Celeron M 430

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7520C has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C
Ryzen 5 7520C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Ryzen 5 7520C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.