Atom E640T vs Celeron M 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.39no data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release dateno data14 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.73 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 3 Watt

Atom E640T has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Atom E640T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Atom E640T
Atom E640T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E640T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Atom E640T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.