Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron M 390

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiencyno data100.00
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$448

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads114
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.8 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 14
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 7 164U has 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 390 or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.