Geode LX 700 vs Celeron M 383

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 383 and Geode LX 700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Geode LX
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Castle
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 383 and Geode LX 700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	1 GHz	0.43 GHz
Bus support	400 MHz	no data
Chip lithography	90 nm	65 nm
64 bit support	-	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 383 and Geode LX 700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)

5 Watt

3.1 Watt

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	90 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	3 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 383 and Geode LX 700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---