Duo LV L2300 vs Celeron M 380

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3266not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.77no data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479479
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 15 Watt

Duo LV L2300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Core Duo LV L2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
Intel Core Duo LV L2300
Core Duo LV L2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Duo LV L2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Core Duo LV L2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.