Xeon w9-3575X vs Celeron M 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+34580%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 34580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking331330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.6714.40
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)44
Threads188
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache97.5 MB
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 52.02
Physical cores 1 44
Threads 1 88
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 340 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 1519% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 34580% higher aggregate performance score, and 4300% more physical cores and 8700% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.