Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Celeron M 370

Place in the ranking	3317	1732
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency	0.68	9.84
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Zen (2017−2020)
Release date	no data	25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	4
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
Multiplier	no data	26
L1 cache	no data	96K (per core)
L2 cache	no data	512K (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	90 nm	14 nm
Die size	no data	209.8 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	no data	4,950 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size	no data	32 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.15	2.60
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	4
Chip lithography	90 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	25 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 19% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G, on the other hand, has a 1633.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.