A4-9120C vs Celeron M 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54
+260%

A4-9120C outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33002841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.688.52
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478BGA
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.54
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 6 Watt

A4-9120C has a 260% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.