A6-9220C vs Celeron M 360

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	2737
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	no data	10.53
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	1.4 GHz	1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.4 GHz	1.8 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
Multiplier	no data	18
L1 cache	no data	160 KB
L2 cache	no data	1 MB (shared)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	no data
Chip lithography	90 nm	28 nm
Die size	no data	124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	no data	1,200 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478, H-PBGA479	FT4
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Virtualization,
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	90 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 360 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---