C-60 vs Celeron M 353

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD C-Series
Power efficiencyno data2.10
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release dateno data22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 353 423
C-60 768
+81.4%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron M 353 has 80% lower power consumption.

C-60, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and C-60. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 244 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.